<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alternative Financial Valuation Concepts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.financialmodelingguide.com/valuation-concepts/alternative-financial-valuation-concepts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.financialmodelingguide.com/valuation-concepts/alternative-financial-valuation-concepts/</link>
	<description>Free online resource for financial modeling advice, tips and tricks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:29:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Financial Modeling Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.financialmodelingguide.com/valuation-concepts/alternative-financial-valuation-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Financial Modeling Guide</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financialmodelingguide.com/valuation-concepts/alternative-financial-valuation-concepts/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Agree.  Thanks for visiting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree.  Thanks for visiting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Investment banking monkey</title>
		<link>http://www.financialmodelingguide.com/valuation-concepts/alternative-financial-valuation-concepts/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Investment banking monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 16:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.financialmodelingguide.com/valuation-concepts/alternative-financial-valuation-concepts/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I would also add precedent transactions in addition to traded comps.  

Control premium is a highly arbitrary and unreliable &#039;valuation&#039; metric.  The 30% premium that us usually taken (based on historical average premia across industries and markets) does not take company specific info into account.  

Rather than a premium analysis, a more useful tool would be back solving an LBO model to see what a financial sponsor would be able to pay.  This is much more informative and also closer to reality.  Whilst the premium is what a naive shareholder may wish to get for control, the sponsor&#039;s ability to pay is a maximum that someone can actually give for the company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also add precedent transactions in addition to traded comps.  </p>
<p>Control premium is a highly arbitrary and unreliable &#8216;valuation&#8217; metric.  The 30% premium that us usually taken (based on historical average premia across industries and markets) does not take company specific info into account.  </p>
<p>Rather than a premium analysis, a more useful tool would be back solving an LBO model to see what a financial sponsor would be able to pay.  This is much more informative and also closer to reality.  Whilst the premium is what a naive shareholder may wish to get for control, the sponsor&#8217;s ability to pay is a maximum that someone can actually give for the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
